Ernest Response

As the current custodian of the letters from Ernest Hemingway to Lillian Ross, I’d like to add a bit of context to Adam Gopnik’s recent piece about Ross’s Profile of the novelist (A Critic at Large, February 17th & 24th). Immediately after leaving Ross in New York, Hemingway wrote to her from the S.S. Île de France, “And you can write any god-damn thing you want except we must avoid lible and hurting people and get the names right”—instructions Ross underlined. When Ross sent Hemingway the Profile proofs, asking for his “corrections and changes” prior to publication (now a bygone practice), he demurred: “I will say nothing about the piece because according to my code if you change, alter or correct then you authorize a piece. Hope I don’t talk that way; but if that is how it sounds to you then you have a perfect right to write it that way.” He did ask her to “delete any reference to my mother,” gave vague answers to her questions about a scar and the coat of arms on his suitcase, and thanked her for “laying off the war and all the things you could have written that people don’t know.”

In a subsequent letter, after Hemingway reread the proofs, he wrote to Ross, “It is a good, funny, well intentioned, well inventioned piece,” and predicted, “Piece will make me many, many enemies,” adding, “But I guess an enemy is not nearly as dangerous, basically, as a friend.” In quoting this, Gopnik left out “well inventioned”—Hemingway’s clear nod to the creative slant that he perceived in Ross’s Profile—as well as his perhaps pointed evaluation of the relative dangers from friends and from enemies.

Sarah Funke Butler
Providence, R.I.

•

Letters should be sent with the writer’s name, address, and daytime phone number via e-mail to themail@newyorker.com. Letters may be edited for length and clarity, and may be published in any medium. We regret that owing to the volume of correspondence we cannot reply to every letter.